<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: UCD School of Medicine Addresses Professor Dolores Cahill’s Controversial COVID-19 Claims	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.collegetribune.ie/ucd-school-of-medicine-addresses-professor-dolores-cahills-controversial-covid-19-claims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.collegetribune.ie/ucd-school-of-medicine-addresses-professor-dolores-cahills-controversial-covid-19-claims/</link>
	<description>Independent UCD News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 21:30:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Damien Devlin		</title>
		<link>https://www.collegetribune.ie/ucd-school-of-medicine-addresses-professor-dolores-cahills-controversial-covid-19-claims/#comment-107097</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damien Devlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 04:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://45.76.141.254/?p=27023#comment-107097</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.collegetribune.ie/ucd-school-of-medicine-addresses-professor-dolores-cahills-controversial-covid-19-claims/#comment-106789&quot;&gt;Ray Mulvaney&lt;/a&gt;.

You don&#039;t debate with bulshitters, the scientific facts are out there. Dr dolores Cahill has no research history in viral propagation, or epidemiology. For the most part, her research has centred around development of laboratory screening and diagnostic tests for conditions like cancer, not virology. Please take the time to look up her research papers,then you decide. You have accused the university of attacking her using &quot;baseless unsupported claims&quot;? Ok, Dr Cahill claimed that if you get covid19, you receive life-long immunity - her words. Where is that proof? 6 strains of coronovirus have impacted the human immune system so far.  To date none of them confer long term, never mind life-long immunity. In fact two of these strains don&#039;t maintain immunity past a year. Debating with her means you are publicising her crap.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.collegetribune.ie/ucd-school-of-medicine-addresses-professor-dolores-cahills-controversial-covid-19-claims/#comment-106789">Ray Mulvaney</a>.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t debate with bulshitters, the scientific facts are out there. Dr dolores Cahill has no research history in viral propagation, or epidemiology. For the most part, her research has centred around development of laboratory screening and diagnostic tests for conditions like cancer, not virology. Please take the time to look up her research papers,then you decide. You have accused the university of attacking her using &#8220;baseless unsupported claims&#8221;? Ok, Dr Cahill claimed that if you get covid19, you receive life-long immunity &#8211; her words. Where is that proof? 6 strains of coronovirus have impacted the human immune system so far.  To date none of them confer long term, never mind life-long immunity. In fact two of these strains don&#8217;t maintain immunity past a year. Debating with her means you are publicising her crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray Mulvaney		</title>
		<link>https://www.collegetribune.ie/ucd-school-of-medicine-addresses-professor-dolores-cahills-controversial-covid-19-claims/#comment-106789</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Mulvaney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://45.76.141.254/?p=27023#comment-106789</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why doesn’t these eminent professors debate Dolores Cahill rather than resort to sniping in journals and making baseless unsupported claims?  After all she has offered to debate anyone and everyone even together so why not take up the challenge?  Surely you can do better than cheap character assassinations?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn’t these eminent professors debate Dolores Cahill rather than resort to sniping in journals and making baseless unsupported claims?  After all she has offered to debate anyone and everyone even together so why not take up the challenge?  Surely you can do better than cheap character assassinations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
