Comments on: UCD President’s Attitude “Quite Sexist”, Says Students’ Union President

By: TanTorinoFan1962

TanTorinoFan1962 — Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:37:26 +0000

I see that my comments are under review. If the Editor of this newspaper values FREE SPEECH then he should approve my comments to let the students see the truth!

By: TanTorinoFan1962

TanTorinoFan1962 — Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:16:43 +0000

Totally agree with you ‘HOMINEM IGNOTUM’. The silly students (I USED TO B ONE) just want to be taken seriously but they have no integrity, which is vital, courage, which one is not to be without. Responsibility is missing from these Millenials IMHO!!!!! The big problem is that these students have bad arguements and just play the sexism and racecards too easily. It’s always shaming great Irish patriots like John Waters and Andrew Deeks. The reporting in this “newspaper” is very biased I think.

For instance, I was protesting outside of the high court today with my idol Gemma, I notice that this “newspaper” hasn’t reported on those protests!!!!!!!!!!!! Seems like the instututional bias runs rampart in the “Tribune”. When I was in UCD back in the 90s (before the liberal agenda set in) (victimhood, oppression Olympics and of course demasculinising males with ficticious social construsts such as the pathetic virtue signalling that this paper extrudes?)…

By: Supreme Leader of UCD

Supreme Leader of UCD — Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:19:20 +0000

I can’t imagine it may be rather difficult for the president of the university to engage with “the voice of students” , give that voice appears to represent the radical left fringe………

By: Hominem Ignotum

Hominem Ignotum — Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:40:42 +0000

Perhaps I am at fault, however, I seem to miss the clear evidence of sexism pertained within President Deek’s comments?

[attitude towards the voice of students “quite sexist”.] The last I checked UCD students as a whole are not of one sex nor gender. Regardless, calling the students emotional is hardly sexist in nature, unless Siewierska is implying that only women, or perhaps Siewierska is implying Deek’s is sexist toward men….although one hardly doubts that to be the case.

The pathetic irony of Siewierska’s comments lies in “it is not good enough for the President of this University, a man”. I’m going to stop her there. Calling out an individual due to their gender is out and out sexism. It’s embarrassing sinking to this low in an attempt to cover up her ineptitude of reasoning.