lol this cant be taken seriously. I stopped reading at “to use the who’s words….” seriously you think the general public is not aware of how utterly corrupt the WHO is and that Bill Gates funds it and is totally invested in vaccinating the world and culling the population …a matter which is recorded and cannot be denied. Go f-ck off back into the murderous swamp you crawled out of.

Just bc you’re not smart enough to see through it doesn’t prove there’s no agenda.. pls..

Funny how this miraculous science, we are all apparently too dumb to understand, is never cited. It’s almost like it doesn’t exist.

“The lockdown is indeed necessary. We all know already that elderly people are more vulnerable to this virus. In the absence of a lockdown, the virus would have spread through the population like wildfire, with low-risk people acting as a stepping-stone for the virus to reach vulnerable people like the elderly and those with underlying conditions. Our best shot at avoiding the mass deaths of vulnerable people, like we saw in Italy and now the US, was to stop the virus in its tracks. According to the vast majority of experts, the best way to do that was a lockdown. “…Utter tripe. Herd immunity would have taken care of business and indeed was well on the way to doing just that before the lockdown. Who are the so-called experts you refer to anyway Name them.
Cahill is right and always was right .

you clearly don’t see the big picture then, what else got ‘fast tracked’ and you missed also the shift that was about to blindside the people, so many things missed as in homework before slandering those who speak out would have been appropriate, or why speak out or why slander – such is the modern age, everyone an expert and publisher, like the author of this hit piece calling himself and editor

It is interesting Dolores Cahill has remarkable credentials, but she is a white female clearly over 50. The latter is why you and the fact checkers are having a field day spewling your and the democratic parties Covid19 scam. Why? In truth the only others to really suffer were the elder, elderly. You and the Democrats are at fault for all “false” hype. Not credible older females!!!!! And also … the hype has also brought even more age discrimination to those over 50.

Has anyone fact checked Adam Boland’s article above. None of the information he has presented is definitive proof of accuracy or inaccuracy of her claims.

Mr Kelly, it pains me to point that because I have been following your party’s doing for quite some time, being of an eurosceptic strain myself.

I am unfortunately aghast as to how many ‘patriotic’ / right-leaning people have gone into full consipiracy theories with this crisis. And I am quite disappointed that Mrs Cahill did not do much better than other “5G-Bill Gates conspiracy” people in this interview with Dave Cahill (… she did even worse a few days later in one with Judy Mikovits and Sherri Tenpenny).

Which makes me sort of sad because either it will weaken the credibility of your movement, either it will boost it somewhat by attracting semi-lunatics imho [Truth is I was already quite appealed at the level of sciences in this country, discussions around this only make me wonder, really…]

Anyway… I notice your answer focus on the milder points of criticism in this article:

1 – the vitamins / supplement (that may help at least some people. True HSE didn’t make a big fuss about it, but this sort of information is not really new and was available elsewhere).

2 – the HCQ, which is still somewhat a ‘grey area’.

However, even your defense of HCQ is not very convincing: first, this list of 50 references “supporting the use of HCQ for Covid19”: looking at it, I see about a third of these papers pre-date Covid19 (and the problem is not the anti-viral effect of HCQ in vitro, but its efficiency in vivo – it wouldn’t be the first time such effect is not carried over in vivo). Quite a few are just non-reviewed preprints (and some relatively oldish at this point), and many others rather inconclusive (e.g. conclusions like “showing some promises, further, more refined studies advised” ). At least one (Davido et al.) has been retracted (for ‘numerous methodological biases”, and it was apparently a diplomatic way to say things). And then there are DIdier Raoult / IHU work… so much to say there… As he is likely the cheeky one who started the hype about HCQ with his “Coronavirus : Game over” video clip back at the end of February….

The methodology of Raoult studies is highly questionable too (and he has been nailed for it in the past); his answer to all objections is basically “I’m a genius, methodology is for the weaks, I don’t have time for it” (but note he has plenty of time for writing a book about the crisis, appearing in the celeb press medias, and making video clips to his own glory…), and he has recently joined an “anti-system” political party (too). He may be right, he may bewrong, but at this point the HCQ has not been proven to be the “miracle cure” that he (and Pr Cahil) was claiming it to be*. Only last week, two more studies (“Recovery”, an NHS-piloted RCT having enrolled thousands of patients, and one on prophylactic use of HCQ) were showing (again, and unfortunately) disappointing results. Whatever the outcome of the HCQ controversy in the long run, Pr Cahill had no good reasons whatsoever to be so sure that it was “the” treatment.

And at least, even if I am suspicious of Raoult egomania and about the quality of his work, I haven’t heard Raoult so far spouting silliness about masks making you ill. Nor about immunity for life being a sure thing. Nor about SARS ‘circulating all over since 2003 and thus everyone being more or less immune”. Nor about a link between what has happened in Lombardy and “flue vaccines grown on dog tissues”. Nor about “no need for social distancing as this is only about “TB smallpox and Ebola” (my god she went so far on that one… has she never learn about measles, to mention a common one?).

Do you have any comments on these points ?

*Note – I have lots of family and friends in Belgium. Some are doctors and nurses. More than enough to know that HCQ has been widely use in the early weeks in attempting to treat COVID19. With – you might have guessed it – “disappointing results”. Even if the doctors didn’t say it (I have recordings from at least 2 of the main hospitals in Brussels and Liège mentioning it), only looking at the country ranking in terms of mortality/million people should be enough to doubt the efficiency of the “treatment”…

There is no amount of evidence you can’t immediately bury by shoveling on more conspiracy.

Someone fact checked the fringe scientist telling me what I want to be true? Must be funded by *spins conspiracy wheel* “Big Pharma”! Therefore I don’t need actually see if the claims are true.

Congratulations, you’ve made your position falsifiable and not even wrong! Please join the Flat Earthers, Anti-vaxxers, HIV-AIDS denialists and Young Earth Creationists at the table for discarded scientific ideas.

At some point you have to look at Cahill’s actual claims. This has been done already and pointed out using peer reviewed science to be utter nonsense.

False balance. And because she’s always going on about anti-vaxx stuff in her interviews I’d add: The resurgence of preventable disease to the list of reasons she shouldn’t be given a platform to convince non-scientists. If she wants a debate with experts she can publish science.