<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Opinion: This Referendum Should Be About Leadership	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.collegetribune.ie/opinion-this-referendum-should-be-about-leadership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.collegetribune.ie/opinion-this-referendum-should-be-about-leadership/</link>
	<description>Independent UCD News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 20:52:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael		</title>
		<link>https://www.collegetribune.ie/opinion-this-referendum-should-be-about-leadership/#comment-92992</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://45.76.141.254/?p=20604#comment-92992</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I fundamentally disagree with you on the call for more pragmatism in the coming referendum. I do agree its a matter of leadership though. Its a matter of holding elected official accountable for broken promises and misleading the electorate. With a divided SU, and divided it is and will remain as rest of its executive members voiced no-confidence in the president, it will be impossible to provide efficient representation of the student body. It has nothing to do with her views as you seem to imply but everything to do with her lack of backbone and inability to put aside her views and work in line with her previous declaration to delegate the responsibilities in circumstances when personal views are in conflict with democratically expressed stance of the student body. She was elected not because of her views but despite her views. Students trusted her and she failed. She antagonized remaining sabbatical officers and thus demonstrated poor leadership and inability to distance herself from her personal agenda. This is hardly a leader material. There are certain mistakes you simply cannot make in position of power and responsibility. This is one of them. 

The fact that this issue arose shortly after election by virtue of its severity makes this point immaterial. In fact one could argue that its better to know what kind of person we are dealing with earlier rather than later. It should be seen as an opportunity to make official responsible for their action and words. A standard long forgotten in the World of big politics. What kind of leaders and representatives will UCD forge and deliver to the Irish society if from the very start they learn that it is ok to lie during the campaign, its ok to push one&#039;s agenda against the wishes of the people whom the official was elected to represent, its ok to manipulate in order to avoid responsibility? If these are to be the &quot;virtues&quot; of the next generation of Irish politicians because we failed to say no and failed again to promote better standards than we will deserve what we will get. Let us not complain because it was our fault. We have placed pragmatism and convenience above values and virtues. We have conveyed the message that you can get away with murder as long as the microwaves are in and there is warm water in the tap. 

There is a heated country-wide debate on the access to abortion taking place and many think it is most unfortunate that this conflict has been introduced as another facet of this public debate. It adds unnecessary temperature to the situation and makes UCD SU&#039;s another front of this battle you say. However I say that however unfortunate it might be for some it is also a great opportunity. An opportunity to demonstrate that SU&#039;s are not only about dealing with trivial, day to day issues but can also deal effectively with issues of greater gravity. It is an opportunity to demonstrate that students are more than university customers and are mature enough to resolve difficult issues in a due process manner.  

Finally I would like to emphasize that in my view this is not a pro-choice vs pro-life issue at all. This is an issue of personal accountability, responsibility, leadership and effective governance. This is too serious of a matter to sit on a fence, contemplate lesser and greater evils and remove the moral argument from the equation. It is a matter of principle and a matter of what type of message will be sent to the current and future Irish politicians. What virtues should they align themselves with to be attractive to next generation of voters?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fundamentally disagree with you on the call for more pragmatism in the coming referendum. I do agree its a matter of leadership though. Its a matter of holding elected official accountable for broken promises and misleading the electorate. With a divided SU, and divided it is and will remain as rest of its executive members voiced no-confidence in the president, it will be impossible to provide efficient representation of the student body. It has nothing to do with her views as you seem to imply but everything to do with her lack of backbone and inability to put aside her views and work in line with her previous declaration to delegate the responsibilities in circumstances when personal views are in conflict with democratically expressed stance of the student body. She was elected not because of her views but despite her views. Students trusted her and she failed. She antagonized remaining sabbatical officers and thus demonstrated poor leadership and inability to distance herself from her personal agenda. This is hardly a leader material. There are certain mistakes you simply cannot make in position of power and responsibility. This is one of them. </p>
<p>The fact that this issue arose shortly after election by virtue of its severity makes this point immaterial. In fact one could argue that its better to know what kind of person we are dealing with earlier rather than later. It should be seen as an opportunity to make official responsible for their action and words. A standard long forgotten in the World of big politics. What kind of leaders and representatives will UCD forge and deliver to the Irish society if from the very start they learn that it is ok to lie during the campaign, its ok to push one&#8217;s agenda against the wishes of the people whom the official was elected to represent, its ok to manipulate in order to avoid responsibility? If these are to be the &#8220;virtues&#8221; of the next generation of Irish politicians because we failed to say no and failed again to promote better standards than we will deserve what we will get. Let us not complain because it was our fault. We have placed pragmatism and convenience above values and virtues. We have conveyed the message that you can get away with murder as long as the microwaves are in and there is warm water in the tap. </p>
<p>There is a heated country-wide debate on the access to abortion taking place and many think it is most unfortunate that this conflict has been introduced as another facet of this public debate. It adds unnecessary temperature to the situation and makes UCD SU&#8217;s another front of this battle you say. However I say that however unfortunate it might be for some it is also a great opportunity. An opportunity to demonstrate that SU&#8217;s are not only about dealing with trivial, day to day issues but can also deal effectively with issues of greater gravity. It is an opportunity to demonstrate that students are more than university customers and are mature enough to resolve difficult issues in a due process manner.  </p>
<p>Finally I would like to emphasize that in my view this is not a pro-choice vs pro-life issue at all. This is an issue of personal accountability, responsibility, leadership and effective governance. This is too serious of a matter to sit on a fence, contemplate lesser and greater evils and remove the moral argument from the equation. It is a matter of principle and a matter of what type of message will be sent to the current and future Irish politicians. What virtues should they align themselves with to be attractive to next generation of voters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
