<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How UCD&#8217;s silence on Dolores Cahill has damaged trust.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.collegetribune.ie/howucds-silence-on-dolores-cahill-has-damaged-trust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.collegetribune.ie/howucds-silence-on-dolores-cahill-has-damaged-trust/</link>
	<description>Independent UCD News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 21:31:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Pippy		</title>
		<link>https://www.collegetribune.ie/howucds-silence-on-dolores-cahill-has-damaged-trust/#comment-106635</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pippy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://45.76.141.254/?p=26841#comment-106635</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A couple hours ago I got a response from UCD:

https://twitter.com/pippy68259470/status/1273322148694818818

I mean it&#039;s technically &quot;a response&quot; but Cahill was presented in anti-vaxx/lockdown media as a scientific expert using her connection to institutions such as UCD to give herself credibility. She would never have been given these platform as a &quot;private citizen&quot; and definitely not have been taken seriously without being a Professor in what to the lay public (not those with a scientific background) appears to be a relevant skill set to SARS-2/COVID-19.  

UCD are choosing to not directly say her claims are unsubstantiated, dangerous, or outright false. Only that she does not represent the position taken by the University.  I hope UCD comes out with a much stronger rebuke of Prof. Cahill&#039;s statements, as other institutions she has used to steal some credibility for her conspiracy theories have already done.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple hours ago I got a response from UCD:</p>
<p><a href="https://twitter.com/pippy68259470/status/1273322148694818818" rel="nofollow ugc">https://twitter.com/pippy68259470/status/1273322148694818818</a></p>
<p>I mean it&#8217;s technically &#8220;a response&#8221; but Cahill was presented in anti-vaxx/lockdown media as a scientific expert using her connection to institutions such as UCD to give herself credibility. She would never have been given these platform as a &#8220;private citizen&#8221; and definitely not have been taken seriously without being a Professor in what to the lay public (not those with a scientific background) appears to be a relevant skill set to SARS-2/COVID-19.  </p>
<p>UCD are choosing to not directly say her claims are unsubstantiated, dangerous, or outright false. Only that she does not represent the position taken by the University.  I hope UCD comes out with a much stronger rebuke of Prof. Cahill&#8217;s statements, as other institutions she has used to steal some credibility for her conspiracy theories have already done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
